On December 16, 2024, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) requested public feedback to “help inform its work to implement” the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (see our summary of these 2023 laws here). The “information solicitation” was issued shortly after California State Senator Scott Wiener and Senator Henry Stern, who authored the bills, penned a letter to CARB expressing their frustration with CARB’s apparent lack of momentum in advance of a July 2025 statutory deadline to adopt regulations governing the greenhouse gas (GHG) and climate risk disclosures that large entities “doing business in California” must make beginning in 2026. CARB is accepting comments in response to the solicitation for 60 days, through February 14, 2025.

This is the first opportunity companies potentially subject to these laws have had to comment on CARB’s implementation of the controversial climate disclosure requirements. While CARB is requesting any feedback relevant to implementing SB 253 and SB 261, it has posed questions about 13 specific topics in its solicitation, including whether to adopt the interpretation of “doing business in California” found in the California tax code, and how CARB should track parent/subsidiary relationships to assure companies that report under a parent are clearly identified and included in any reporting requirements. Notably, CARB is not specifically requesting comment on whether subsidiaries that do not independently meet the reporting thresholds should be covered or excluded from the laws. Many of the questions in the solicitation seek basic background information on GHG reporting, including the appropriate timeframes and frequency of reporting, when data is available from prior years, and what software systems are used for reporting. CARB’s information request seeks similar input on the mechanics of climate-related financial disclosures.

CARB’s solicitation indicates it is trying to quickly get up to speed on the GHG and climate-disclosure landscape. Companies with real-world information regarding the challenges and issues associated with assembling and reporting information on GHG emissions and climate-related risks can help shape CARB’s decision-making as it begins to develop draft regulations, and should strongly consider providing feedback in response to the solicitation. Additionally, companies that have questions regarding the scope and applicability of SB 253 and 261 have the opportunity to make CARB aware of open questions not addressed by the legislation and to suggest reasonable solutions for consideration by CARB as it builds out its climate-related disclosure program.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Shawn Zovod Shawn Zovod

Shawn practices environmental and natural resources law and strategy. She specializes in Clean Water Act (CWA), Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) permitting, as well as the preparation of…

Shawn practices environmental and natural resources law and strategy. She specializes in Clean Water Act (CWA), Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) permitting, as well as the preparation of environmental documents under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Photo of Jason Langford Jason Langford

Jason is an associate in the firm’s Corporate practice. He focuses his practice primarily on helping domestic and foreign issuers raise capital while complying with the disclosure obligations and reporting requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934…

Jason is an associate in the firm’s Corporate practice. He focuses his practice primarily on helping domestic and foreign issuers raise capital while complying with the disclosure obligations and reporting requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as securities exchange requirements and listing standards. In addition, he assists companies with corporate governance and affiliated entity management, supports merger and acquisition transactions, and assists with general corporate and compliance matters.

Photo of Melissa Horne Melissa Horne

Melissa helps industrial and utility clients understand and navigate complex environmental requirements, with a focus on real-world implications for their business. She focuses her practice heavily on Clean Air Act and climate change issues, and advises clients on environmental justice and ESG matters.

Liz Glusman

Liz navigates clients through a variety of complex environmental compliance areas to manage risks, achieve strategic business goals, and stay ahead of the evolving regulatory landscape.

Photo of David Meyers David Meyers

Dave counsels senior executives, directors and public company boards and committees on corporate governance, securities regulation, securities offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and other major transactions. He regularly advises public companies on compliance with all federal securities laws, including Sarbanes-Oxley and NYSE/Nasdaq matters. In…

Dave counsels senior executives, directors and public company boards and committees on corporate governance, securities regulation, securities offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and other major transactions. He regularly advises public companies on compliance with all federal securities laws, including Sarbanes-Oxley and NYSE/Nasdaq matters. In addition, he assists companies with public disclosures and the drafting and filing of related documents. Dave counsels clients in a broad range of industries, including energy, manufacturing, retail and logistics.