On January 30, 2020, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) released its anticipated Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) proposed rule. The purpose of the proposed rule is to codify the December 2017 Department of Interior (“DOI”) Solicitor opinion (“M-Opinion”) limiting liability under the MBTA. The M-Opinion overturned an earlier Obama Administration M-Opinion explicitly finding that MBTA liability applied to incidental take.

The proposed rule seeks to narrowly interpret liability under the MBTA to apply only those actions specifically “directed at” migratory birds that “reduce animals to human control.” This interpretation would expressly exclude the “incidental taking” of a migratory bird when such take is not the purpose of an action. The USFWS explains that the proposed rule will provide much-needed clarity, noting that the Obama administration’s interpretation was not codified in any regulation and was inconsistently applied through prosecutorial discretion and guidance based on when a take might be “foreseeable,” including from wind turbines, electrical transmission wires, and oil drilling. Additionally, the proposal would resolve a federal circuit split regarding whether the MBTA applies to incidental take. The proposal would make it clear that a violation of the MTBA “unambiguously require[s] an action that is directed at migratory birds, nests, or eggs.”

If finalized as proposed, the rule would provide greater certainty to the regulated community, as a regulation would not be changed as easily as the M opinions have been. Nevertheless, some uncertainty remains as to the scope of historically regulated activity that will now be exempt. Comments on the proposed rule are due on March 19, 2020. To avoid review under the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”), the final rule will need to be issued by May 20, 2020. Meeting the CRA deadline may prove challenging as USFWS has also initiated the required National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) review of the MBTA proposed rule. USFWS is now in the process of public scoping, and comments on the scope of the NEPA review are also due to USFWS by March 19, 2020.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Andrea Wortzel Andrea Wortzel

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply…

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply issues in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Beyond her water practice, Andrea advises clients on endangered species issues, landfill permitting and compliance, waste permitting, environmental compliance and audit programs and environmental enforcement defense. Andrea also regularly counsels clients on legislative and regulatory strategies to promote her clients’ objectives.

Photo of Morgan Gerard Morgan Gerard

Morgan’s practice focuses on advising public and private sector clients on environmental and energy regulatory compliance, including permitting, rulemaking, and enforcement actions. She has focused on following the emerging energy trends and the associated environmental issues that arise in strengthening grid resilience and…

Morgan’s practice focuses on advising public and private sector clients on environmental and energy regulatory compliance, including permitting, rulemaking, and enforcement actions. She has focused on following the emerging energy trends and the associated environmental issues that arise in strengthening grid resilience and modernizing the energy system. Morgan has counseled clients ranging from those engaging in the hydropower licensing and relicensing process to electric utilities, wholesale generators, and distributed energy manufacturers, including electric vehicle manufacturers, solar installers and energy storage providers. She also counsels clients on matters arising under the National Environmental Policy Act, the Federal Power Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, the Endangered Species Act, and similar state and local regulatory schemes.