The COVID-19 pandemic has elevated fiscal concerns of water and sewer service providers, with many states imposing a moratorium on the collection of delinquent bills and the termination of service. The affordability of water and sewer service has also been a central topic in environmental justice discussions. In the midst of this heightened interest, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released its long-awaited proposed updates to its Clean Water Act (“CWA”) affordability guidance. The pre-publication version of its 2020 Financial Capability Assessment for CWA Obligations (“2020 FCA”) was released on September 15, 2020. The proposal builds on EPA’s prior guidance, issued in 1997, as well as its 2014 Financial Capability Assessment Framework.  The purpose of the guidance is to establish criteria for EPA consideration of the impact of water quality, stormwater, and drinking water requirements on affordability. This information can then be used to prioritize different regulatory requirements and establish longer compliance schedules in permits and enforcement actions.

While the 2020 FCA builds on EPA’s 1997 guidance, it expands the realm of information to be considered to better reflect the realities for a community’s most impoverished residents. The proposal includes new metrics to inform a community’s water infrastructure implementation schedule, including indicators that more accurately reflect how much low-income communities can afford to pay for water infrastructure upgrades. Additionally, the 2020 FCA lays out two alternative approaches for assessing financial capability that a community may choose to employ.

The first alternative adopts the residential indicator approach from the 1997 guidance but expands it to include the consideration of other factors to account for the impacts on the most financially vulnerable populations. These factors include water costs, household incomes, impacts on populations in service areas with incomes in the lowest quintile (rather than a historic focus on median household income), and other poverty indicators. Importantly, this alternative also allows a community’s total water costs (wastewater, stormwater, and drinking water) to be considered when negotiating an implementation schedule for CWA obligations.

The second alternative uses a dynamic financial and rate model to evaluate the impacts of rate increases over time, including for customers with incomes in the lowest quintiles. Under the proposal, communities will also be able to submit additional information to inform affordability discussions including such metrics as unemployment rates, debt service coverage ratio, debt to income ratios, and population trends.

EPA includes 16 specific questions on which it requests feedback in the proposal to ensure that any final guidance captures a broad range of affected communities. Once published in the Federal Register, the proposal will be open for a 30-day public comment. Please contact Andrea Wortzel, Patrick Fanning, or Viktoriia De Las Casas for more information regarding the proposal.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Andrea Wortzel Andrea Wortzel

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply…

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply issues in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Beyond her water practice, Andrea advises clients on endangered species issues, landfill permitting and compliance, waste permitting, environmental compliance and audit programs and environmental enforcement defense. Andrea also regularly counsels clients on legislative and regulatory strategies to promote her clients’ objectives.

Photo of Viktoriia De Las Casas Viktoriia De Las Casas

Viktoriia is an environmental and natural resources attorney with experience in regulatory compliance, permitting, due diligence, enforcement, and litigation matters. She focuses her practice on advising clients on all aspects of compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Bald and Golden Eagle…

Viktoriia is an environmental and natural resources attorney with experience in regulatory compliance, permitting, due diligence, enforcement, and litigation matters. She focuses her practice on advising clients on all aspects of compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Viktoriia works with real estate developers, wind, solar, and transmission line operators, and other businesses on wildlife issues that come up during federal and state permitting. In addition, Viktoriia is a member of the firm’s State Energy Regulation practice where she represents clients before the Virginia State Corporation Commission and Maryland Public Service Commission. Over the years Viktoriia has also developed proficiency in advising clients how to address environmental justice requirements that arise in permitting, litigation, and other contexts. She has also been assisting clients in developing company-wide strategies for compliance with various reporting obligations, for example, EPA’s TSCA PFAS reporting rule.