In conjunction with Bloomberg BNA, TS Environmental and Natural Resources Partner Mack McGuffey will present a webinar on the EPA’s new “SIP call” requiring new rules for startup, shutdown, and malfunction emissions on Thursday, July 23 at 1:00 p.m.

In its last published opinion of the term, the United States Supreme Court held that EPA should not have ignored costs in deciding whether to regulate mercury and other hazardous air emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants.  In that regulation, known as EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), EPA had attempted to demonstrate that such regulation was “appropriate and necessary” without considering cost.  Although four justices found EPA’s actions to be reasonable based on the theory that EPA considered costs later in the process of setting specific emission limits, a five-justice majority held that EPA had acted unreasonably in ignoring costs in its threshold “appropriate and necessary” finding.

On June 12, EPA published its final SSM SIP Call recalling EPA-approved state air rules governing emissions associated with startup, shutdown and malfunction events at regulated facilities in 36 states.  The list of affected states is posted on EPA’s website here.  Some of these state rules have been approved and on the books for decades, while others were approved by EPA just within the last several years.  EPA is giving the affected states until November 22, 2016 to revise their SIPs and submit any new provisions to EPA for review and approval.

We invite you to register for the upcoming webinar on “Legal Challenges to Business in Latin America”, June 23 at 2:00pm EST. This one-hour webinar, hosted by Troutman Sanders and NewFields, will give you a better understanding of the challenging, complex and changing environmental and legal issues in Latin America.

On May 27, 2015, after many years of regulatory uncertainty, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S. Army Corps (“Corps”) released a final rule defining the scope of “Waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. The Rule aims to “clarify” the reach of the federal government’s authority under the Clean Water Act, including every section and program under the Act.  Its implications are far reaching to industry, home builders, farmers, ranchers, and other landowners.

“Environmental class actions are notoriously difficult to predict,” says Troutman Sanders’ Environmental Partner Doug Henderson in Law360’s article, 5 Environmental Class Actions Attorneys Need to Track. The article profiles 5 environmental class action matters that attorneys should keep an eye on. The matters include suits again some high-profile brands

Troutman Sanders LLP announced today that Richmond partner Brooks Smith has been named to The National Law Journal’s inaugural list of the top Energy & Environmental Trailblazers. The list features lawyers who have moved the needle in the ever-evolving energy and environmental landscape.

Doug Henderson, Fitzgerald Veira, and Brooks Smith’s article, The Clean Water Act Permit Shield—Recent Battles, appeared in the ABA’s environmental journal, Natural Resources & Environment.   Surveying one of the most important defenses under the Clean Water Act, the “permit shield” defense, the article takes a critical

Atlanta Environmental and Natural Resources laywers, Angela Levin and Maria Houser, recently authored the article, “In a World Without Congressional Reform: A New (Old) Role for EPA under TSCA Section 6,” which appeared in the ABA’s Spring 2015 environmental journal, Natural Resources & Environment. Addressing the

Troutman Sanders is opening an office in San Francisco on April 1, 2015. This will be the firm’s fourth office on the West Coast, with existing offices in Orange County, San Diego, and Portland. The firm’s San Francisco office will be located in the Financial District at 580 California Street.